Ramblings on life as I attempt to grasp a better understanding of God and how He is connected with It.
12.14.2008
MLS Cup 2008
From left to right, you've got: Yours Truly, MLS Rookie and Champ Cory Elenio, Jason Pele (a groomsman from my wedding—he's Samoan), Eric Johnson, and George (I believe it's "Skylar") ________ (last name is a little foggy for me). We're all buddies from the University of Evansville. Cory, Eric, Pele and I played there a little bit and George was our trainer for a while. Isn't that special, now we're all, all grown up.
Cory just finished his first season with the Columbus Crew, and already has an MLS Championship Ring. Proud of that boy... I've got great memories of him watching Aqua Teen Hunger Force, making fun of me for not being good at soccer, singing Queen's Bicycle song (and that other freaky "Pin Ball Master" song), and most importantly, a precious moment coming back from Chic-fil-a entitled I Don't Remember the Dance.
12.09.2008
11.06.2008
Mr. President
Although I cannot say I was excited to watch Obama win the Election on Tuesday night, I can say that I certainly still have hope for our country—and for our next President. In a speech given after the announcing of the Election Results, Obama spoke openly to Republicans, stating that we all must work together, and we all must fight together to bring unity to a torn country. I respect what he said very much, and I will hold him to what was said.
Even though Barack Obama did not have my vote in this election, he has my full, 100% support as the Commander in Chief of this Blessed Nation. I am a patriot, and I love my country, and I will fully back Barack Obama. However, I say this because first I am a follower of Jesus Christ, and I trust that even though Obama will move into the White House come January, God is still firmly seated on His Throne above. May we never forget to seek God in all things, for the days are evil (Ephesians 5:15)—let us turn as a nation to God, who is Lord of All (Isaiah 6:1, 3; Revelation 4:8).
the hand of the Lord,
Like the rivers of water
He turns it wherever He wishes.
Proverbs 21:1
10.28.2008
What A Servant Looks Like
Whatever you do, work heartily, as for the Lord and not for men.
Colossians 3:23
A few days ago I mentioned that the "best servant" award for our ABF's building of the Box Maze was awarded to Danny and David Durham. Just to back up that decision, let me tell you a little about Danny.
The Fall Festival was on Sunday night from 6:00 pm to about 9:00 pm. After the Sunday Morning service, I stayed at the church all day in order to prepare for the event. Danny and David stayed with me as well. They were with me all day. Those guys are amazing. As I said, the event was officially finished around 9:00, but we had to stay behind and work on cleaning up the mess, and stomp down all those boxes, and roll up extension cords, etc.
After a while of cleaning up, I took a look at the time. It was 10:15 pm. I had hung out with Danny and David before on a Sunday night or weeknight, and typically they need to be home by 10:00 so that they can get in bed early enough to get up bright and early for work. Obviously, when I realized that it was after 10:00, and we still had (at least) a 10 minute drive to get Danny home, I was worried.
I ran over to Danny and put my hand on his shoulder and said, "Danny, it's after 10:00, we really need to get you home." He looked up at me with those awesome eyes and paused for just a second. I fully expected him to reply: "So, So... we should get going so that I can get in bed." Perhaps that would have been the "wise" thing for him to say, or at least the "comfortable" thing for him to say. But instead, after his pause, Danny looked up at me and said, "So, So... So what else is Deonna doing that we need to help her with?"
That night I saw Danny unhesitatingly carry large boxes of electrical cords from one end of the church to the other, I saw him clean an entire Men's Restroom—including a clever stunt standing on the counter and thoroughly scrubbing all the mirrors, I saw him comb the entire parking lot looking for and picking up loose pieces of trash that blew away during the event... and the only thing he had to say while I was driving him home was, "that was good... I clean a lot of bathrooms at my work."
I worked there all day because my wife works at the Church, and I was supposed to be there getting everything ready and cleaned up. Danny had no reason to be there—except to reflect the gentle heart of Christ to those who had eyes to see. I selfishly thought I had a servant-heart; my mundane efforts to serve others are nothing but a foil contrasted against Danny and David's selfless hearts.
with God a thing to be grasped, but made himself nothing,
taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men.
Philippians 2:6–7
Whoever humbles himself like this little child
is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
Matthew 18:4
Checking My Watch: Ramblings on Biblical Narrative
Does that make me a liar? Would that have made my story about Danny untrue? Certainly not. We all add elements when we tell stories that belong more accurately to our own ingenuity than to the actual events of reality. I didn't lie because I wanted to alter the truth, I simply was telling a story, and my details would have added to the appeal of the story—nothing more. This is also true with Scripture. When it comes to Biblical Narrative, we are not supposed to read ever single little word and arrogantly profess that every single thing exactly as it happen. Though the Word of God is inspired and inerrant, it also was written by human authors—creative, unique, and limited, human authors. Thus, when we read the two different accounts* of how Peter first met Jesus in the Gospels (Matthew & Mark vs. John), we should not conclude that these stories contradict each other; instead we must simply realize that each account of this meeting is told through the perspective of a unique third party—be it Matthew, Mark, or John. All of whom, throughout their detailed Gospel accounts of the life of Christ, will often describe the times when they look down and "check their watch," all by means to better illuminate the wonderful story of our Redeemer's life on earth, our Immanuel.
*(1) Matthew 4:18–20 and Mark 1:16–18
(2) John 1:35–42
10.26.2008
10.08.2008
Micah 2 Chart (Updated)
The themes per verse-pairs are:
- vv. 1 and 13: "Who is doing the LEADING?"
- vv.2 and 12: "GATHERING"
- vv.3 and 11: "RESPONSE to What God is Saying"
- vv.4 and 10: "God's WRATH"
- vv.5 and 9: "Having no DIRECTION"
- vv.6 and 8: "Things of God which Evildoers CORRUPT"
to him who walks uprightly?"
Micah 2:7b
A.Mazing.:Get Pumped!
10.06.2008
FireProof
Reasons to go see the movie FireProof:
1. This is a film created by Christians. Although the quality of this film—acting, directing, cinematography, etc.—is certainly sub-par compared to films produced from mainstream Hollywood, you should support the efforts of other Christians. Many people scoff at this film and criticize the embarrassing previous efforts made by Christian organizations to produce a movie, but we should support the efforts of other Christians.
2. That being said, viewing this movie is an edifying experience. It presents the Gospel in Biblical language, and it promotes Biblical virtues and morality in an environment that is so filled with immoral and anti-God experiences—"Quarantine," "Blindness," "Saw V," etc.
3. It promotes fighting to save a marriage in the context of a Divorce-Saturated society. There is a wise quote from the movie in which a man says (regarding loving your wife), "do not follow your heart; you must lead your heart" in loving your wife. Loving your spouse is a decision to be obedient to a covenant... serving and loving your spouse no matter what her response is or what gratification you get in return. That is how Christ loves His Church; and this is a choice that can only be carried out when we fully grasp this love of Christ.
4. Non-Believers who view this movie will be exposed to the Gospel. Even though "conversions" and "Gospel Presentations" in films are inevitably cheesy, God can, and will, use scenes from this movie to convict non-believing hearts.
5. This film promotes the Christlike quality of selflessness. Kirk Cameron's character experiences consistent situations that bring frustration... yet he is driven to press on with a selfless purpose.
10.03.2008
Notes for Micah 2
9.25.2008
What is man that You are mindful of him?
The Voyager I, a probe sent by NASA to study our solar system, passed beyond the orbit of Pluto in 1990. Still in range of contacting Earth, NASA scientists had the Voyager I look back toward our planet and take a picture, which has since been received. This picture is referred to as "The Pale Blue Dot," which is fitting once you have seen the image (seen above). Carl Sagan, the famous astronomer, in response to this image, wrote:
Look at the earth in this picture—a pale, blue dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. And on that dot everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. Every act of human heroism or betrayal, the sum total of human joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, moral teacher and corrupt politician, every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there—on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. What is the glory and triumph of the greatest conquerors and builders of empires? They were the momentary masters of a fraction of a blue dot. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in teh vast and enveloping cosmic dark.
the Solar System," Parade, 9 September 1990, 20–21.
regard him,
or the son of man that You
think of him?
Man is like a breath;
his days are like a passing
shadow.
Psalm 144:3–4
the work of Your fingers,
the moon and the stars,
which You have set in place,
what is man that you are mindful
of him,
and the son of man that you care
for him?
Psalm 8:3–4
Chafer on Evolution
9.12.2008
A Taste of Fatherhood
God of the Storm
9.10.2008
9.04.2008
8.28.2008
Two Things I Find Utterly Fascinating About Our God
8.26.2008
Where is Your Heart Today?
8.25.2008
The Realness of Blemishes
8.15.2008
The Meat: Conversation With a Friend—Abridged
This is dialogue between my friend Andy and myself from earlier today. There is some good stuff going on there, so take a look.
me: You need to check out that sermon though, the thing that shocked me was the position on Creation. Not necessarily Evolution, but not 6-Day Creation.
(Dave's sermon)
patton.andy: yeah i've heard him say that before.
I am not sure if I should be bothered by it
I remember at Kanakuk the guy talking about how if you don't believe in a literal 6 day creation you may not be a christian... that seems a little extreme to me.
it was alienating. I am not necessarily against 6 day creation, but it makes sense to me that a god-guided evolution could be the way it went down
but the whole question just doesn't concern my that much (although I know it "probably should"... like politics)
me: I guess my problem with that, is that in my heart it dilutes God's Word. I feel like we are taking science and placing it in the Bible. I would prefer to take the Word and place that into our world, not vice-versa.
If that makes sense.
patton.andy: That makes sense. However, if God's word is the Truth then it ought to have no disagreement with science, in fact, science is just catching up with God. We are following God's trail, pursuing , but never exhausting the.
the wonders of his workmanship
so science and the Bible are not at odds
perhaps god created evolution, not secular evolution like they teach in school, but perhaps evolution was simply the means by which God built up an ordained end
or are you talking about how that means that then you would have to rethink the literalness of genesis
as in, God taking woman out of mans rib?
me: And I have no problem with that. But isn't a greater display of power to speak and have a glorious, beautiful creation, already mature and functioning? As opposed to taking millions of years? I just don't see the point of evolution outside from the secular, scientific view on the universe.
The "rib" is most likely Hebrew poetry. But I have no problem taking it literally.
patton.andy: Who are we to say what the greater display of power and glory is. Wouldn't it be a greater display of power to heal an amputee? or to answer my every prayer? But God doesn't do those things
me: Sure he doesn't. But that is a different arena of God working.
me: I fear that if we adjust the "literalness" of the Word too much to fit our present understanding of the universe, we may lose a lot of the glory that God has worked through time in light of our reason.
patton.andy: But God gave us science. Isn't science just exploring the mechanics of the glory of God
In that case, we don't see the glory of God until we understand it
me: Certainly. But Andy I think that every single thing that God gave to us we tend to corrupt and use it for evil. I know I do. With money, food, my freedom, my wife—the greatest example of this is His Word.
patton.andy: And you are saying that what we are talking about might be a corruption of science?
me: No. I think we can use science for means that are not glorifying to God. There is really no way to prove, or know, how exactly God created. But if He did do it in six days and we use the science of today to "prove" that He created over millions of years, he certainly isn't glorified in that.
Remember though... I'm not trying to be a tool or a jerk. I'm just thinking.
patton.andy: Yeah I don't think you are being a tool... i am loving this conversation.
here are my thoughts
patton.andy: 1. We can use science in ways that are not glorifying to God (i.e. the new atheism using "science" to disprove God... or the atomic bomb being used to kill innocents) BUT science is still a good thing created by God to be used for his glory. If this is true then the MORE we understand science the more God is glorified.
2. Perhaps if science shows that creation was made in more than 6 days it is because it actually was made that way. Why would Christians view that science as an enemy?
What have we to fear from that?
me: Good point. There is nothing to fear except for the possibility (however miniscule) of scientific findings somehow being used by Satan to deceive or lead us away from God. Which ultimately, like you mentioned earlier, one of the finest qualities for a Christian to have (yet so few do) is humility.
patton.andy: Yes. Science being basically a good thing like any other created thing does not mean we are free to be undiscerning with it
other thoughts?
me: Not really. But I'm going to ponder the point about what "presents a greater display of God's power," either a 6-day creation, or a 6-million year creation. But ultimately it doesn't matter. In the Lord may we always take refuge, no matter what happens around us (Ps 11).
patton.andy: amen to that.
me: Amen.
Now you need to go get on that preaching list.
patton.andy: to add to that I would throw in the question: what business is it of ours to have an opinion on which is the greater glory
how could we even tell?
what could we ground our opinions in beyond mere cultural fancy?
me: We cannot. His ways are higher and far beyond our own. And we must only worship HIm because, truly, can his glory even be measured?
Conversation With a Friend—Unabridged
patton.andy: Mr. Kyle A Reed
me: Hey Andy.
patton.andy: hey man. how are you
me: I am doing well. Last week I finished up a summer class, so it's really nice to have this week off.
patton.andy: great. we just took a staff retreat to covenant seminary this week. talked to some professors. it was a great time
me: Sweet. When are you gonna take some classes there, huh?
patton.andy: I am trying to decide if i should go next fall right now
me: Fall '09? Are you considering any other schools?
patton.andy: nope. the draw of going to seminary drops a lot when I think of not going to covenant b/c it's in st. louis and b/c of the professors
me: So you don't want to get out of Missouri? —and you're set on those profs? ... fair enough.
patton.andy: My brother is in St. Louis and I would love to live near him for a time. And one of the big reasons I would go to Covenant wold be Jerram Barrs, not to mention all the other things I have heard about certain professors
me: Tell me about Barrs.
patton.andy: Jerram worked with L'abri for 17 years and now is the director of hte francis schaeffer institute. he speaks at the l'abri conference we go to every year. he has written a few books and you can listen to a few of his classes on the covenant website such an incredible teacher and he is so humble that's the main reason I want to study with him, hoping to learn from his humility
me: That's awesome man. I will check out the Covenant website. Can I podcast any of his stuff?
patton.andy: go to covenantseminary.edu/worldwide
me: I'm there...
patton.andy: you can podcast three entire classes he teaches. they recorded every word said in lecture and put it online
patton.andy: the apologetics and outreach class is the one everyone says changed them after they come through covenant
its about understanding the culture we live in. loving people who aren't christians. learning how to communicate with that culture
he also teaches two classes on francis schaeffer which are great
me: You've already listened to them all?
patton.andy: jerrams classes
me: I'm trying to get that stuff into iTunes... But how about a question: Are we living in the "Seventh Day?"
patton.andy: i don't know what that means
me: I listened to Luke's sermon on the 3 tough questions... and then I listened to Dave Cover's about Science and God/The Bible. He made the point that Gen 2 doesn't "end" day 7 of Creation, so we're still living "day 7"
patton.andy: ok i missed that one. i was gone somewhere
me: Well dang it Andy. I actually was taken aback with some of the things Dave said.
patton.andy: I will have to listen to it. what was off-putting
me: And speaking of Luke, when are you going to get up there and preach?
patton.andy: ha. never probably
me: you should, man.
patton.andy: luke is what I call the "big leagues"
i am triple A
I'll have to get on the sign up list though
me: You would tear it up in there.
patton.andy: i would love it
have you done any preaching in seminary?
have you enjoyed it?
me: I've got my first preaching class this fall. It's funny though, because I know the "style," if you will, of Dallas Seminary Preaching, but the best preacher I've ever heard is pretty much the exact opposite.
patton.andy: hmm. funny how seminaries have styles
me: It's disturbing.
patton.andy: and who is the best preacher you've heard?
me: Matt Chandler. He's done some stuff with Mars Hill and the Acts 29 stuff. I know Luke's heard of him.
patton.andy: I have heard of him and I think heard one sermon. People say he is great
a lot like mark driscoll
me: Podcast him. Right now. Village Church.
Driscoll's outstanding. But Matt Chandler blows him away. No one has ever spoken and brought conviction to my heart like Matt Chandler. His teaching is unreal.
patton.andy: here is the thing about podcasting things for me right now... I just need to read the word. It is SO easy for me to listen to sermons. maybe too esy
i don't know if that is a true thought, but I have felt my desire to actually read the word myself drained lately and it annoys me
me: I understand completely. But honestly for me, being in Dallas, I spend about an hour and a half every day in the car, so I'm always listening.
patton.andy: yeah thats what i listen to in cars too
me: But don't let anything quench your thirst for God's Word. Matt Chandler will bring conviction, sure. But the Holy Spirit is pretty good, too.
patton.andy: check out the audio resources tab on our blog as soon as i finish it in about 20 minutes
me: Sure man.
You need to check out that sermon though, the thing that shocked me was the position on Creation. Not necessarily Evolution, but not 6-Day Creation.
(Dave's sermon)
patton.andy: yeah i've heard him say that before.
I am not sure if I should be bothered by it
I remember at Kanakuk the guy talking about how if you don't believe in a literal 6 day creation you may not be a christian... that seems a little extreme to me.
it was alienating. I am not necessarily against 6 day creation, but i makes sense to me that a god-guided evolution could be the way it went down
but the whole question just doesn't concern my that much (although I know it "probably should"... like politics)
me: I guess my problem with that, is that in my heart it dilutes God's Word. I feel like we are taking science and placing it in the Bible. I would prefer to take the Word and place that into our world, not vice-versa.
If that makes sense.
patton.andy: That makes sense. However, if God's word is the Truth then it ought to have no disagreement with science, in fact, science is just catching up with God. We are following God's trail, pursuing , but never exhausting the.
the wonders of his workmanship
so science and the Bible are not at odds
perhaps god created evolution, not secular evolution like they teach in school, but perhaps evolution was simply the means by which God built up an ordained end
or are you talking about how that means that then you would have to rethink the literalness of genesis
as in, God taking woman out of mans rib?
me: And I have no problem with that. But isn't a greater display of power to speak and have a glorious, beautiful creation, already mature and functioning? As opposed to taking millions of years? I just don't see the point of evolution outside from the secular, scientific view on the universe.
The "rib" is most likely Hebrew poetry. But I have no problem taking it literally.
patton.andy: Who are we to say what the greater display of power and glory is. Wouldn't it be a greater display of power to heal an amputee? or to answer my every prayer? But God doesn't do those things
me: Sure he doesn't. But that is a different arena of God working.
me: I fear that if we adjust the "literalness" of the Word too much to fit our present understanding of the universe, we may lose a lot of the glory that God has worked through time in light of our reason.
patton.andy: But God gave us science. Isn't science just exploring the mechanics of the glory of God
In that case, we don't see the glory of God until we understand it
me: Certainly. But Andy I think that every single thing that God gave to us we tend to corrupt and use it for evil. I know I do. With money, food, my freedom, my wife—the greatest example of this is His Word.
patton.andy: And you are saying that what we are talking about might be a corruption of science?
me: No. I think we can use science for means that are not glorifying to God. There is really no way to prove, or know, how exactly God created. But if He did do it in six days and we use the science of today to "prove" that He created over millions of years, he certainly isn't glorified in that.
Remember though... I'm not trying to be a tool or a jerk. I'm just thinking.
patton.andy: Yeah I don't think you are being a tool... i am loving this conversation.
here are my thoughts
patton.andy: 1. We can use science in ways that are not glorifying to God (i.e. the new atheism using "science" to disprove God... or the atomic bomb being used to kill innocents) BUT science is still a good thing created by God to be used for his glory. If this is true then the MORE we understand science the more God is glorified.
2. Perhaps if science shows that creation was made in more than 6 days it is because it actually was made that way. Why would Christians view that science as an enemy?
What have we to fear from that?
me: Good point. There is nothing to fear except for the possibility (however miniscule) of scientific findings somehow being used by Satan to deceive or lead us away from God. Which ultimately, like you mentioned earlier, one of the finest qualities for a Christian to have (yet so few do) is humility.
patton.andy: Yes. Science being basically a good thing like any other created thing does not mean we are free to be undiscerning with it
other thoughts?
me: Not really. But I'm going to ponder the point about what "presents a greater display of God's power," either a 6-day creation, or a 6-million year creation. But ultimately it doesn't matter. In the Lord may we always take refuge, no matter what happens around us (Ps 11).
patton.andy: amen to that.
me: Amen.
No you need to go get on that preaching list.
patton.andy: to add to that I would throw in the question: what business is it of ours to have an opinion on which is the greater glory
how could we even tell?
what could we ground our opinions in beyond mere cultural fancy?
me: We cannot. His ways are higher and far beyond our own. And we must only worship HIm because, truly, can his glory even be measured?
• • •
Another question, one that I've been praying about—if you don't mind a change of subject? Or do you have to go?
patton.andy: I've got 15 minutes
write your question. i am going to take a 2 minute shower. brb
me: There may not really an answer to this question, at least not a simple one. Basically... I don't like the way we "do communion," and I don't like the way we do "baptism." Hmm. What do you think? (Now, I don't know how I would prefer to "do" the sacraments; I just know that I don't really think they are performed today as God intended them to be)
me: Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Do you care if this conversation is added to my blog? might be a good one to hold on to.
patton.andy: Add away. I was actually thinking of putting something on my blog too. Man, people with blogs are weird.
me: At least they think alike!
patton.andy: My thoughts are short seeing as how I have not developed yet strong opinions on the sacraments
i guess i should have changed "short" to "non-existent"
but tell me more about what makes you say that
me: haha.
patton.andy: have T minus 2 minutes
me: [keep in mind, most of the churches I've been attending post-Crossing have been baptist]well, think about it for me. I've seen numerous "baptism celebrations," or whatever, and the church is supposed to be all excited when someone is baptized. At least that's what is always said beforehand, you know, "we should be celebrating more than at the super bowl!" all that jazz. And I look around at everyone, and some people are dumbfounded, but most are doing this fake, celebration yell thing. And it's weird. It feels artificial. I've heard often that "it's an outward expression of an inward change," but is that what it is in scripture? Is it really just to make a "public profession?"
patton.andy: 1. yeah that is weird/artificial
patton.andy: 2. It seems to be at least an outward sign of an inward change, but also seems to be, in a mysterious way, a means of grace. In the way that communion is to, somehow we are blessed/strengthened by the sacraments. Not saying "saving grace" or a special blessing as if we should try to do communion every day or get baptzed every time we are feeling tempted... but that they are good thigns
thigns
things
lit
but i don't really know
that seems like one of those seminary questions
which is probably why you are asking it you seminarian you
me: you tool.
Actually, it's just kind of been something I've thought about since college.
But you're definitely right about being a means of grace. I would say that GRACE is the purpose of the sacraments as opposed to an outward symbol.
patton.andy: yes
me: But I just think most have lost that in Churches.
you need to go...
but also... And communion... (1) a symbol? or (2) a meal of fellowship to be shared among the Body, and during that union to focus on ("remember") that Christ died for our sins.
patton.andy: i need to go
yes
to both
and means of grace
me: proud of you.
We need to do this again.
soon
patton.andy: good talk. see you out there
heck yes
i pick the topic next time
me: Agreed.
patton.andy: dispensationalism.
and no. i never listened to that sermon
i am a bad friend
where can i find it?
me: Haha... do you really want to get me started on the Big D?
patton.andy: no not really
i have to learn/care about it first
maybe next year
there definitely is a course i would have to take called covenant theology
ok i am going to be late
bbye
me: Open iTunes, do a Browse in the Podcast section for "Denton Bible Church" or "Tommy Nelson." It should be on there. It is from July 07. You can hear my voice in that podcast, too.
patton.andy: got it